Logic Puzzles
This topic will be exclusively for logic puzzles!
Do you prefer riddles? (click here to go to the riddle topic)
Let's start with a logic puzzle! Which square fits in the last grid?

What comes next?


You have two ropes coated in an oil to help them burn. Each rope will take exactly 1 hour to burn all the way through. However, the ropes do not burn at constant rates. There are spots where they burn a little faster and spots where they burn a little slower, but it always takes 1 hour to finish the job.
With a lighter to ignite the ropes, how can you measure exactly 45 minutes?
Serena and Venus decided to play tennis against each other. They bet one dollar on each game they played. Serena won three bets and Venus won five dollars.
How many games did they play?
@DarkWolf
Serena won 3 bets.
But Venus won 5$
Which means V had to beat S atleast 5 times. Then V had to beat S 3 more times to nullify the lead. And 3 more games where S took the lead.
So, in all 11 games.
Of which V won 8 and S won 3
@DarkWolf
Assuming their bets apply after a single game of 4 points is won (not set, or match), then $S = bets won by S - bets lost by S, $V = bets won by V - bets lost by V or $V = bets lost by S - bets won by S because bet lost by S = bet won by V. Question says S lost 3 bets, and V had $5, so I think:
$S = 3 - bets lost by S, $V = bets lost by S - 3 or 5 = bets lost by S - 3, bets lost by S = 8 and total games played = bets lost + won by one person which is 11
If they're betting after a tennis match is won, and there's 3 sets in a match, and 6 games in each set, they must've been playing a lot of tennis games
@kyan1
Typo correction: Question says S lost won 3 bets
@kyan1 @DonaldDraper @Barltik2065
11 is indeed the intended answer!
The phrasing was used to make clear Serena did win three times (getting 1 dollar each time) but in total still had to pay 5 dollars to Venus. With that interpretation 11 is the correct answer. If you have a different interpretation, I'd still be happy with the answer as long as your calculations are correct.👍
Which comes next in the sequence?
6, 13, 28, 59, ?
A. 111
B. 122
C. 126
D. 128
Which conclusion follows from the statements, with absolute certainty?
- None of the stamp collectors is an architect.
- All the drones are stamp collectors.
A. all stamp collectors are architects
B. architects are not drones
C. no stamp collectors are drones
D. some drones are architects



