ScienceDaily: Moral illusions may alter our behavior
“"We tend to use what we can call a 'moral wiggle room' to justify selfish decisions. This means that we can act selfishly in certain situations, without feeling that our actions are morally wrong," says Kajsa Hansson, newly promoted doctor in economics at Linköping University, with a thesis entitled Moral Illusions. In the thesis, she examines several aspects of what she terms 'moral illusions', and compares them to optical illusions. She concludes that we can tweak our morals in some situations to increase self-benefit.
"Fairness is in the eye of the beholder. But I have used a broad definition of morality, and I don't judge whether a certain type of fairness is good or bad. Instead, I use the idea of whether a person experiences that they are not living up to their own notion of good morality," says Kajsa Hansson.
Moral illusions mainly arise in competitive situations when many people compete for the same rewards. This is a consequence of psychological mechanisms that cause us to assess fairness differently, depending on whether we are successful or not. This is particularly the case when we lack information about the fairness of the situation. When the brain attempts to fill in missing information, it may create an image that does not match reality -- in the same way as occurs for an optical illusion.
One example is how we view losing. If we lose, we tend to blame it on that the playing field was not level, or that the game was rigged. When we win, in contrast, we explain this by our excellent playing skills. This tendency may describe why successful people believe that the world is a meritocracy, and that economic inequalities are thus fair.”
Some Insights From This Article
Be careful of moral illusions or what the article calls, the “little moral wiggle room” that we create for ourselves when we make a decision in which if another person was doing it, you would find it morally wrong.
Most people’s tendency is to justify their own moral behavior by making small justifications on why we did such. The article mentions that when we lose, we will often try to blame external conditions and environments before first looking at ourselves. However when we win we attribute that success to ourselves
This is called in psychology attribution theory in which humans will rationalize behaviors as being caused by someone’s own personality or just external factors. Morally questionable behaviors performed by ourselves tend to be justified with our own reasoning while for others it is more quickly assumed that it was just how they are.
Do you recognize any moral illusions in your life? What are some ways we can combat this?
Full article is here!
#Morality #Attribution #Behavior
@sunnyWriting4806
Id like to think that I don’t tend to have any moral illusions recently, but of course there may have been times throughout my life.
To combat, it's important to hold ourselves accountable and always look at different perspectives.
Thanks for the article! 💛💫
@sunnyWriting4806 I think this is something we all experience more or less. In my opinion it's worth wondering if this behavior is triggered because of suppressed anger towards the other person that activates unhealthy defense mechanisms. Aka revenge. It's better to talk with someone and be true instead of trying to repay them and creating a bigger emotional gap in the relationship. Thank you for the interesting post!